Your Law Firm Says It Is Using AI. The Data Says Otherwise.

Ninety-one percent of legal professionals say their own firms are falling short of what AI could actually deliver for them.

Read that number again. This is not a survey of skeptical outsiders. This is the industry looking directly at itself and admitting, at a rate of nine out of ten, that it is not getting it right. The number comes from Thomson Reuters's 2026 Future of Professionals report, released this week, and it forces a question every startup founder and small business owner needs to sit with. If the firms serving the largest, best-resourced clients in the world cannot get this right, what exactly is happening to you?

Table of Contents

1. What the Report Actually Found
2. The Number That Should Worry You Most
3. Why This Is Happening
4. The Version of This Problem That Does Not Make the Report
5. What This Means If You Are Looking for a Firm Right Now

What the Report Actually Found

Thomson Reuters surveyed 1,816 professionals across law, accounting, and compliance this spring. The findings are not subtle, and they do not soften with context.

Seventy-four percent of professionals now use AI tools several times a week. Nearly half use them multiple times a day. By every measure of adoption, the technology is already here. It is already in daily use. And still, when those same professionals were asked whether their organizations are actually capturing what the technology can deliver, 91 percent said no.

Adoption is not the same thing as performance. That gap is the entire story.

The Number That Should Worry You Most

Here is where it stops being an internal industry problem and becomes a client problem.

Seventy-eight percent of corporate clients now consider AI-enabled quality improvements essential to how they evaluate outside counsel. Only 6 percent believe most providers are actually delivering on that expectation. Sit with the distance between those two numbers. Seventy-eight percent expect it. Six percent think they are getting it.

Thirty-two percent of corporate clients say they are actively reconsidering their outside-counsel relationships within the next twelve months. Thomson Reuters puts a number on what that means in dollar terms: roughly $143 billion in annual legal and professional services revenue is in active reconsideration in the United States market alone, right now, this year.

And it is not only the clients who are restless. One in four legal professionals says they would consider leaving their own firm within the next two years if the promised value of AI does not materialize.

Every side of this relationship is losing patience at the same time.

Why This Is Happening

The report names the cause plainly, and it is simpler than most people expect. Firms are adopting AI tools without changing how they actually work. The technology exists. The workflows built around it do not.

This shows up in two specific ways. First, firms are using AI to move faster internally without passing any of those efficiency gains to the client. The billable hour gives a firm no financial incentive to do so. Moving faster on an hourly model can mean earning less, not more, so the incentive to actually change is weaker than it looks from the outside. Second, many firms are deploying generic AI tools rather than tools purpose-built for legal work, which limits what the technology can meaningfully do and raises the risk of confident-sounding output that is quietly wrong.

The result is a widening gap between what clients believe they are paying for and what they are actually getting. At the enterprise level, general counsel and procurement teams can see this gap. They can audit it. They can renegotiate, or walk.

Most founders and small business owners cannot do any of that. They do not have a procurement team. They do not have a general counsel auditing invoices. They have a name they found through a search or a referral, and no way to know whether that name is one of the firms winning this transition or one of the firms quietly falling behind it.

The Version of This Problem That Does Not Make the Report

The Thomson Reuters survey focuses on corporate legal departments and large professional services relationships, because that is where the money is visible and the data is easiest to collect.

But the same dynamic exists at every level of the market, and the leverage only gets worse as the client gets smaller. A seed-stage startup hiring outside counsel for a fundraising round has no benchmark whatsoever for whether the firm it found is using AI well, poorly, or not at all. A small business navigating a contract dispute cannot audit a firm's technology stack before signing an engagement letter. It has no way to even ask the right question. The same information asymmetry documented at the enterprise level in this report is happening to everyone below it. It is simply invisible, because nobody is surveying it.

What This Means If You Are Looking for a Firm Right Now

The straightforward implication of the Thomson Reuters data is that the legal market is in the middle of an active sorting process, happening right now, whether anyone below the enterprise level can see it or not. Firms that implement AI well will deliver stronger work, faster, at a real cost advantage. Firms that do not will fall behind, and their clients will eventually feel it, whether or not they can name the reason.

That sorting is visible to the clients with the resources to track it. It is invisible to almost everyone else, and invisibility is not the same thing as absence. The firms falling behind on this transition are still practicing law, still signing engagement letters, still billing by the hour exactly as they did five years ago. Nothing about the experience of hiring one of them looks different from hiring one of the six percent getting this right, until the work itself reveals which kind of firm you hired.

Ninety-one percent of the industry just told Thomson Reuters it knows this gap exists. The honest admission is the easy part. Closing it is the part that is actually happening right now, unevenly, and mostly out of view.

---

Source: AI is Ready but Firms are Not: How Falling Behind on AI Implementation is Costing Clients and Talent, Thomson Reuters, PR Newswire, June 22, 2026.